WilberNightSoftware studio
FA EN
Sign in Start a project
wilbernight/docs/nextjs-vs-laravel.md

Next.js or Laravel: which should power your online store?

12 October 2026 · 12 min read Architecture
body

The short answer

TL;DR Under ~3,000 products with a small team: Laravel alone is enough. Large catalogs where mobile speed decides sales: Next.js in front, Laravel behind.

Over the past year we shipped three stores: one pure Laravel, one pure Next.js with a headless CMS, and one hybrid. Same team, similar budgets, very different results after six months.

How we compared

We looked at four things a store owner actually pays for: time to launch, monthly cost to keep running, speed on a mid-range phone, and how easily the in-house team could change things.

Maintenance cost

Laravel onlyNext.js onlyHybrid
Time to launch7 weeks9 weeks10 weeks
Server cost / month6M IRT9M IRT11M IRT
Mobile load (LCP)2.4s1.1s0.9s
Changes by in-house teameasyneeds a JS devadmin easy, UI needs JS

Speed and SEO

Most of the hybrid’s speed came from rendering category pages on the server and caching them for 60 seconds. Product data stays fresh, the page arrives already built.

export const revalidate = 60 // rebuild at most once a minute

export default async function Category({ params }) {
  const items = await fetch(`${API}/categories/${params.slug}`)
    .then(r => r.json())
  return <Grid items={items} />
}

For SEO the three were close once redirects and structured data were right. The bigger risk is the migration itself: we map every old URL before writing any code.

Our verdict

  • Small catalog, tight budget, non-technical team → Laravel.
  • Content-heavy brand site with a small shop → Next.js with a headless CMS.
  • Large catalog where mobile speed sells → hybrid.

Not sure where you fit? Bring your product count and traffic to a free discovery session and we’ll tell you honestly — even if the answer is a ready-made template.